The Myth of Normal

Master case overview

Master file reference

GPRCC-ILL-2022-GM-650487

Illustrative status

On Hold

Author / reference identity

Gabor Maté

Subject area

Health & Medicine

Work

The Myth of Normal

Review focus

Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology. Program questions are selected for this subject area; no passage-level findings are asserted.

Proposed formats · scenario

Ebook and library editions

Proposed market scope · scenario

Domestic release with a proposed translation-rights package

Book release date

13 September 2022
Imperial College library / OverDrive ↗

Registration date · illustrative

20 September 2022

Publication and registration basis

The Myth of Normal: Original release date. The modeled registration is seven days after release. Where a source gives only a month or year, dates are shown as a range rather than inventing a day.

Modeled review date

21 October 2022

Source basis

Library title, author, subject mapping and catalog program definitions; no manuscript examined.

Programs & status

This illustrative file covers 10 program records, 37 review controls and 25 open items. Select a program for its review details, document checklist and next action.

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2022-GM-650487-HMPC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2022-GM-650487

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

0 of 4 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

The Myth of Normal by Gabor Maté · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 4

1. HMPC-101

   Claim classification

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, separate general discussion from diagnostic or treatment claims in the proposed scope. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

2. HMPC-102

   Evidence quality

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, record study type, limitations and relevance for claims selected for review. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

3. HMPC-103

   Professional review

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, define the qualifications and scope needed for a proposed specialist review. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

4. HMPC-105

   Evidence updates

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, identify time-sensitive health references for later rechecking. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

Requirements to complete 4

• Health claim classification ledgerClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: HMPC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative
• Clinical evidence appraisal worksheetRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: HMPC-102.Awaiting submission · illustrative
• Specialist review briefClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: HMPC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative
• Health evidence update scheduleClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: HMPC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2022-GM-650487-FCRS

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2022-GM-650487

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

2 of 4 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

The Myth of Normal by Gabor Maté · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 4

1. FCRS-102

   Source traceability

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, record author, date, edition and location of supporting references. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

2. FCRS-103

   Context and limitations

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, retain qualifications and avoid widening conclusions beyond their sources. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

3. FCRS-104

   Data reproduction

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, reconcile quoted figures with their source tables and units. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

4. FCRS-105

   Correction control

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, track the edition in which a proposed correction would take effect. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

Requirements to complete 4

• Source bibliography and locator indexCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: FCRS-102.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative
• Claim qualification scheduleClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: FCRS-103.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative
• Statistical reproduction worksheetRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: FCRS-104.Awaiting submission · illustrative
• Correction and version logCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: FCRS-105.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2022-GM-650487-PFVR

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2022-GM-650487

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

1 of 4 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

The Myth of Normal by Gabor Maté · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 4

1. PFVR-101

   Credential scope

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, identify exactly which professional claims are proposed for author positioning. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

2. PFVR-102

   Verification sources

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, identify primary sources needed to verify each credential. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

3. PFVR-103

   Jurisdiction wording

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, distinguish academic qualifications from jurisdiction-specific practice rights. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

4. PFVR-104

   Biography consistency

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, align proposed retailer, jacket and speaker biographies. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

Requirements to complete 4

• Author credential claim inventoryClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: PFVR-101.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative
• Credential verification checklistClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: PFVR-102.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative
• Professional title wording matrixCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: PFVR-103.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative
• Biography comparison sheetRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: PFVR-104.Awaiting submission · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2022-GM-650487-AEPC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2022-GM-650487

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

2 of 3 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

The Myth of Normal by Gabor Maté · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 3

1. AEPC-101

   Promotional claims

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, match proposed promotional language to documented support. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

2. AEPC-103

   Material connections

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, identify sponsorship disclosures that would be needed for the campaign. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

3. AEPC-104

   Excerpt context

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, retain context when selecting extracts for advertising. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

Requirements to complete 3

• Advertising claim matrixCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: AEPC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative
• Campaign disclosure scheduleCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: AEPC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative
• Promotional excerpt reviewRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: AEPC-104.Awaiting submission · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2022-GM-650487-IMRC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2022-GM-650487

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

0 of 3 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

The Myth of Normal by Gabor Maté · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 3

1. IMRC-101

   Fact and opinion boundaries

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, separate editorial interpretation from independently checkable claims in proposed publicity. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

2. IMRC-102

   Non-affiliation wording

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, review references to people and institutions for unintended endorsement implications. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

3. IMRC-105

   Escalation protocol

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, define which disputed statements would require specialist review before reuse. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

Requirements to complete 3

• Publicity claim and source ledgerRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: IMRC-101.Awaiting submission · illustrative
• Non-affiliation wording sheetClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IMRC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative
• Media review escalation planClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IMRC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2022-GM-650487-IDLC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2022-GM-650487

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

2 of 5 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

The Myth of Normal by Gabor Maté · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 5

1. IDLC-101

   Agreement inventory

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, identify proposed publisher, distributor and retail permissions for the named work. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

2. IDLC-102

   License boundaries

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, map term, format, territory, language and sublicensing limits. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

3. IDLC-103

   Retail metadata

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, reconcile title, author credit, edition description and rights-holder attribution. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

4. IDLC-104

   Accounting and reporting

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, document royalty reporting intervals, deductions and audit provisions. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

5. IDLC-105

   Termination controls

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, define takedown, stock sell-off and rights reversion responsibilities. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

Requirements to complete 5

• Distribution agreement inventoryClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IDLC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative
• Distribution license matrixCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IDLC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative
• Retail metadata approval sheetClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IDLC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative
• Royalty and reporting scheduleRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: IDLC-104.Awaiting submission · illustrative
• Termination and reversion checklistCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IDLC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2022-GM-650487-IRTC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2022-GM-650487

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

3 of 5 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

The Myth of Normal by Gabor Maté · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 5

1. IRTC-101

   Chain of title

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, identify the party authorized to grant rights and reconcile contributor assignments. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

2. IRTC-102

   Territory and format scope

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, map languages, formats, exclusivity and reserved territories without assuming worldwide rights. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

3. IRTC-103

   Edition history

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, separate original publication rights from revised-edition and supplementary-material rights. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

4. IRTC-104

   Quotation permissions

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, record the basis for reuse of any third-party extracts in the proposed edition. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

5. IRTC-105

   Reversion and reservations

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, identify expired grants, reserved uses and conflicting options. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

Requirements to complete 5

• Ownership and contributor assignment scheduleCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IRTC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative
• Territory, language and format matrixCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IRTC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative
• Edition and rights chronologyClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IRTC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative
• Third-party permissions registerCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IRTC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative
• Prior grants and reversion scheduleRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: IRTC-105.Awaiting submission · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2022-GM-650487-CAVR

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2022-GM-650487

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

1 of 3 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

The Myth of Normal by Gabor Maté · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 3

1. CAVR-101

   Visual asset provenance

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, record the source and permitted use of cover and interior visual assets. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

2. CAVR-103

   Format reuse

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, check proposed visual reuse across print, ebook, audio and promotion. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

3. CAVR-105

   Edition approval

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, track the approved cover version for each proposed edition. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

Requirements to complete 3

• Cover and artwork provenance registerCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: CAVR-101.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative
• Visual reuse permission matrixRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: CAVR-103.Awaiting submission · illustrative
• Cover version approval logClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: CAVR-105.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2022-GM-650487-IBEM

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2022-GM-650487

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

0 of 3 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

The Myth of Normal by Gabor Maté · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 3

1. IBEM-101

   Protected assets

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, separate protectable text and artwork from third-party names and lawful references. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

2. IBEM-103

   Monitoring exclusions

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, exclude commentary, criticism and other lawful references from proposed monitoring. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

3. IBEM-105

   Notice readiness

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, specify evidence capture and rights-holder approval before any proposed notice. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

Requirements to complete 3

• Protected asset inventoryClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IBEM-101.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative
• Monitoring keyword and exclusion planRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: IBEM-103.Awaiting submission · illustrative
• Evidence capture and escalation protocolClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IBEM-105.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2022-GM-650487-AVRR

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2022-GM-650487

Review scope

Ebook and library editions

Evidence position

1 of 3 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

The Myth of Normal by Gabor Maté · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 3

1. AVRR-101

   Audio grant

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, separate narration and audio distribution rights from print rights. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

2. AVRR-102

   Performer agreement

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, define narrator credit, recording use and permitted reuse. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

3. AVRR-104

   Pronunciation guidance

   For the proposed scope of The Myth of Normal, prepare a subject-appropriate name and terminology pronunciation guide. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

Requirements to complete 3

• Audio rights matrixClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: AVRR-101.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative
• Narrator agreement checklistRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: AVRR-102.Awaiting submission · illustrative
• Pronunciation and production briefCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: AVRR-104.Submission attempt 1 · 25 September 2022 · reviewed 21 October 2022 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Evidence and document index

A modeled evidence schedule for The Myth of Normal. These are document requirements and scenario states, not uploaded attachments or manuscript citations.

Consolidated program status

Illustrative review history

Generated milestones showing how this workflow could progress; these events did not occur for the named author.

Program fee breakdown

The original illustrative case total is allocated across the 10 programs below. These example amounts are not payment receipts or quotations.

Total illustrative fees · USD$47,500

These restored case allocations are separate from the planning bands for new quotes. A written scope and quote determine the charge for an actual matter.

Next steps

1. Reconcile outstanding documents against the program references in the evidence index.
2. Prepare one coordinated completion package with edition, rights and source schedules.
3. Review each open item and record whether it is resolved, requires clarification or needs specialist referral.
4. Issue any subsequent determination only after the evidence review is complete.

This sequence describes the modeled on hold workflow only.