Home / Registry / Record
Publishing rights & compliance · Illustrative record

The Nine

Law & Justice · Publication and program dossier

By Jeffrey Toobin

Master file reference · illustrativeGPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152
Cover of The Nine by Jeffrey Toobin
Representative publication · edition may varyFind this edition ↗ (opens in a new tab)
Illustrative case statusOn HoldScenario review date · 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified)
08Program records
33Review controls
18Open items

Master case overview

Master file reference
GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152
Illustrative status
On Hold
Author / reference identity
Jeffrey Toobin
Subject area
Law & Justice
Work
The Nine
Review focus
Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology. Program questions are selected for this subject area; no passage-level findings are asserted.
Proposed formats · scenario
Print and ebook
Proposed market scope · scenario
Domestic release with a proposed translation-rights package
Book release date
2007
Publication history ↗
Registration date · illustrative
8 January 2007 – 7 January 2008 (release day unverified)
Publication and registration basis
The Nine: First book publication; excludes earlier serialization and later editions. The modeled registration is seven days after release. Where a source gives only a month or year, dates are shown as a range rather than inventing a day.
Modeled review date
8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified)
Source basis
Library title, author, subject mapping and catalog program definitions; no manuscript examined.

Programs & status

This illustrative file covers 8 program records, 33 review controls and 18 open items. Select a program for its review details, document checklist and next action.

Requirements outstanding

Completed items are marked with a check. Required or clarification items must be resolved before this scenario can proceed.

15 / 33 completed
DPPROn Hold

Defamation, Privacy & Personality Rights Review

GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152-DPPR

Review scope: privacy boundaries, allegation handling, jurisdiction referral.

3 review controls1 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$3,450

View review details ↓
PPASOn Hold

Public Figure & Public Affairs Source Review

GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152-PPAS

Review scope: public-record sourcing, quotation context, opinion classification.

5 review controls2 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$4,150

View review details ↓
FCRSOn Hold

Fact-Checking & Research Substantiation File

GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152-FCRS

Review scope: claim inventory, source traceability, data reproduction.

4 review controls3 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$4,850

View review details ↓
NDISOn Hold

News, Documentary & Investigative Source Integrity

GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152-NDIS

Review scope: confidentiality handling, corroboration plan, redaction control.

3 review controls1 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$2,750

View review details ↓
IMRCOn Hold

International Media & Reputation Clearance File

GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152-IMRC

Review scope: fact and opinion boundaries, interview preparation, edition-specific publicity.

4 review controls3 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$3,450

View review details ↓
IDLCOn Hold

International Distribution & Licensing Compliance File

GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152-IDLC

Review scope: agreement inventory, license boundaries, retail metadata.

5 review controls3 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$4,150

View review details ↓
IRTCOn Hold

International Rights & Territory Control File

GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152-IRTC

Review scope: chain of title, territory and format scope, quotation permissions.

4 review controls2 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$4,850

View review details ↓
CAVROn Hold

Cover, Artwork & Visual Asset Rights Record

GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152-CAVR

Review scope: visual asset provenance, designer permissions, format reuse.

5 review controls3 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$2,850

View review details ↓
DPPR · Illustrative program record

Defamation, Privacy & Personality Rights Review

On Hold
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152-DPPR
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152
Review scope
Print and ebook
Evidence position
2 of 3 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The Nine by Jeffrey Toobin · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 3

  1. DPPR-102

    Privacy boundaries

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, document a proposed basis for using private information, where applicable. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

  2. DPPR-103

    Allegation handling

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, separate attributed allegations from findings and editorial opinion. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

  3. DPPR-105

    Jurisdiction referral

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, identify markets where specialist review would be required. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

Requirements to complete 3

  • Privacy and consent assessmentCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: DPPR-102.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
  • Attribution and allegation checklistRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: DPPR-103.Awaiting submission · illustrative
  • Local-review referral matrixCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: DPPR-105.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
Further-review standard. Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

PPAS · Illustrative program record

Public Figure & Public Affairs Source Review

On Hold
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152-PPAS
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152
Review scope
Print and ebook
Evidence position
3 of 5 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The Nine by Jeffrey Toobin · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 5

  1. PPAS-101

    Public-record sourcing

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, link checkable public-affairs statements to their original records. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

  2. PPAS-102

    Quotation context

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, retain the context and date of any quotations selected for publicity. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

  3. PPAS-103

    Opinion classification

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, distinguish commentary from allegations and factual assertions. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

  4. PPAS-104

    Institution references

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, avoid presenting an institution’s mention as its endorsement. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

  5. PPAS-105

    Source currency

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, identify time-sensitive references that would need updating. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

Requirements to complete 5

  • Public-record source ledgerRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: PPAS-101.Awaiting submission · illustrative
  • Quotation context sheetCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: PPAS-102.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
  • Fact and opinion classification matrixCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: PPAS-103.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
  • Institution reference reviewCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: PPAS-104.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
  • Source currency checklistClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: PPAS-105.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
Further-review standard. Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

FCRS · Illustrative program record

Fact-Checking & Research Substantiation File

On Hold
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152-FCRS
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152
Review scope
Print and ebook
Evidence position
1 of 4 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The Nine by Jeffrey Toobin · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 4

  1. FCRS-101

    Claim inventory

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, classify factual, historical and statistical claims selected for the review scope. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

  2. FCRS-102

    Source traceability

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, record author, date, edition and location of supporting references. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

  3. FCRS-104

    Data reproduction

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, reconcile quoted figures with their source tables and units. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

  4. FCRS-105

    Correction control

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, track the edition in which a proposed correction would take effect. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

Requirements to complete 4

  • Claim-to-source ledgerClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: FCRS-101.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
  • Source bibliography and locator indexCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: FCRS-102.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
  • Statistical reproduction worksheetRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: FCRS-104.Awaiting submission · illustrative
  • Correction and version logClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: FCRS-105.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
Further-review standard. Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

NDIS · Illustrative program record

News, Documentary & Investigative Source Integrity

On Hold
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152-NDIS
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152
Review scope
Print and ebook
Evidence position
2 of 3 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The Nine by Jeffrey Toobin · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 3

  1. NDIS-102

    Confidentiality handling

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, separate public references from material requiring restricted access. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

  2. NDIS-103

    Corroboration plan

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, identify which claims would need independent corroboration. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

  3. NDIS-105

    Redaction control

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, define version controls for any required redactions. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

Requirements to complete 3

  • Source handling matrixCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: NDIS-102.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
  • Corroboration worksheetRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: NDIS-103.Awaiting submission · illustrative
  • Redaction and access logCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: NDIS-105.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
Further-review standard. Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

IMRC · Illustrative program record

International Media & Reputation Clearance File

On Hold
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152-IMRC
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152
Review scope
Print and ebook
Evidence position
1 of 4 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The Nine by Jeffrey Toobin · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 4

  1. IMRC-101

    Fact and opinion boundaries

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, separate editorial interpretation from independently checkable claims in proposed publicity. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

  2. IMRC-103

    Interview preparation

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, prepare source-backed responses and distinguish the author’s position from promotional paraphrases. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

  3. IMRC-104

    Edition-specific publicity

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, align retailer summaries and campaign copy with the edition proposed for release. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

  4. IMRC-105

    Escalation protocol

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, define which disputed statements would require specialist review before reuse. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

Requirements to complete 4

  • Publicity claim and source ledgerClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IMRC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
  • Interview and media briefingClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IMRC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
  • Campaign and jacket-copy comparisonCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IMRC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
  • Media review escalation planRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: IMRC-105.Awaiting submission · illustrative
Further-review standard. Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

IDLC · Illustrative program record

International Distribution & Licensing Compliance File

On Hold
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152-IDLC
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152
Review scope
Print and ebook
Evidence position
2 of 5 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The Nine by Jeffrey Toobin · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 5

  1. IDLC-101

    Agreement inventory

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, identify proposed publisher, distributor and retail permissions for the named work. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

  2. IDLC-102

    License boundaries

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, map term, format, territory, language and sublicensing limits. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

  3. IDLC-103

    Retail metadata

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, reconcile title, author credit, edition description and rights-holder attribution. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

  4. IDLC-104

    Accounting and reporting

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, document royalty reporting intervals, deductions and audit provisions. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

  5. IDLC-105

    Termination controls

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, define takedown, stock sell-off and rights reversion responsibilities. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

Requirements to complete 5

  • Distribution agreement inventoryClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IDLC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
  • Distribution license matrixRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: IDLC-102.Awaiting submission · illustrative
  • Retail metadata approval sheetCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IDLC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
  • Royalty and reporting scheduleCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IDLC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
  • Termination and reversion checklistClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IDLC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
Further-review standard. Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

IRTC · Illustrative program record

International Rights & Territory Control File

On Hold
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152-IRTC
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152
Review scope
Print and ebook
Evidence position
2 of 4 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The Nine by Jeffrey Toobin · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 4

  1. IRTC-101

    Chain of title

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, identify the party authorized to grant rights and reconcile contributor assignments. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

  2. IRTC-102

    Territory and format scope

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, map languages, formats, exclusivity and reserved territories without assuming worldwide rights. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

  3. IRTC-104

    Quotation permissions

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, record the basis for reuse of any third-party extracts in the proposed edition. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

  4. IRTC-105

    Reversion and reservations

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, identify expired grants, reserved uses and conflicting options. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

Requirements to complete 4

  • Ownership and contributor assignment scheduleRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: IRTC-101.Awaiting submission · illustrative
  • Territory, language and format matrixClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IRTC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
  • Third-party permissions registerCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IRTC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
  • Prior grants and reversion scheduleCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IRTC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
Further-review standard. Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

CAVR · Illustrative program record

Cover, Artwork & Visual Asset Rights Record

On Hold
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152-CAVR
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2007-JT-578152
Review scope
Print and ebook
Evidence position
2 of 5 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The Nine by Jeffrey Toobin · Case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 5

  1. CAVR-101

    Visual asset provenance

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, record the source and permitted use of cover and interior visual assets. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

  2. CAVR-102

    Designer permissions

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, separate designer deliverables from third-party stock and font licenses. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

  3. CAVR-103

    Format reuse

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, check proposed visual reuse across print, ebook, audio and promotion. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

  4. CAVR-104

    Credit requirements

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, record mandatory image credits and license conditions. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

  5. CAVR-105

    Edition approval

    For the proposed scope of The Nine, track the approved cover version for each proposed edition. Apply this check in the context of case citations, legal commentary and jurisdiction-specific terminology.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

Requirements to complete 5

  • Cover and artwork provenance registerRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: CAVR-101.Awaiting submission · illustrative
  • Designer and supplier rights checklistCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: CAVR-102.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
  • Visual reuse permission matrixClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: CAVR-103.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
  • Visual credit-line sheetClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: CAVR-104.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
  • Cover version approval logCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: CAVR-105.Submission attempt 1 · 13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified) · reviewed 8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified) · illustrative
Further-review standard. Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

Evidence and document index

A modeled evidence schedule for The Nine. These are document requirements and scenario states, not uploaded attachments or manuscript citations.

Control referenceDocument requirementScenario state
DPPR-102Privacy and consent assessmentCompleted · submitted and reviewed
DPPR-103Attribution and allegation checklistRequired · awaiting submission
DPPR-105Local-review referral matrixCompleted · submitted and reviewed
PPAS-101Public-record source ledgerRequired · awaiting submission
PPAS-102Quotation context sheetCompleted · submitted and reviewed
PPAS-103Fact and opinion classification matrixCompleted · submitted and reviewed
PPAS-104Institution reference reviewCompleted · submitted and reviewed
PPAS-105Source currency checklistClarification needed · submitted and reviewed
FCRS-101Claim-to-source ledgerClarification needed · submitted and reviewed
FCRS-102Source bibliography and locator indexCompleted · submitted and reviewed
FCRS-104Statistical reproduction worksheetRequired · awaiting submission
FCRS-105Correction and version logClarification needed · submitted and reviewed
NDIS-102Source handling matrixCompleted · submitted and reviewed
NDIS-103Corroboration worksheetRequired · awaiting submission
NDIS-105Redaction and access logCompleted · submitted and reviewed
IMRC-101Publicity claim and source ledgerClarification needed · submitted and reviewed
IMRC-103Interview and media briefingClarification needed · submitted and reviewed
IMRC-104Campaign and jacket-copy comparisonCompleted · submitted and reviewed
IMRC-105Media review escalation planRequired · awaiting submission
IDLC-101Distribution agreement inventoryClarification needed · submitted and reviewed
IDLC-102Distribution license matrixRequired · awaiting submission
IDLC-103Retail metadata approval sheetCompleted · submitted and reviewed
IDLC-104Royalty and reporting scheduleCompleted · submitted and reviewed
IDLC-105Termination and reversion checklistClarification needed · submitted and reviewed
IRTC-101Ownership and contributor assignment scheduleRequired · awaiting submission
IRTC-102Territory, language and format matrixClarification needed · submitted and reviewed
IRTC-104Third-party permissions registerCompleted · submitted and reviewed
IRTC-105Prior grants and reversion scheduleCompleted · submitted and reviewed
CAVR-101Cover and artwork provenance registerRequired · awaiting submission
CAVR-102Designer and supplier rights checklistCompleted · submitted and reviewed
CAVR-103Visual reuse permission matrixClarification needed · submitted and reviewed
CAVR-104Visual credit-line sheetClarification needed · submitted and reviewed
CAVR-105Cover version approval logCompleted · submitted and reviewed

Consolidated program status

ProgramIllustrative statusOpen itemsNext action
DPPROn Hold1Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination.
PPASOn Hold2Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination.
FCRSOn Hold3Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination.
NDISOn Hold1Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination.
IMRCOn Hold3Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination.
IDLCOn Hold3Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination.
IRTCOn Hold2Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination.
CAVROn Hold3Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination.

Illustrative review history

Generated milestones showing how this workflow could progress; these events did not occur for the named author.

Scenario dateModeled milestone
8 January 2007 – 7 January 2008 (release day unverified)Registration modeled
13 January 2007 – 12 January 2008 (release day unverified)Evidence package submitted · scenario
25 January 2007 – 24 January 2008 (release day unverified)Submitted evidence reviewed · scenario
8 February 2007 – 7 February 2008 (release day unverified)Completion request modeled

Program fee breakdown

The original illustrative case total is allocated across the 8 programs below. These example amounts are not payment receipts or quotations.

ProgramProgram nameAllocated fee (USD)
DPPRDefamation, Privacy & Personality Rights Review$3,450
PPASPublic Figure & Public Affairs Source Review$4,150
FCRSFact-Checking & Research Substantiation File$4,850
NDISNews, Documentary & Investigative Source Integrity$2,750
IMRCInternational Media & Reputation Clearance File$3,450
IDLCInternational Distribution & Licensing Compliance File$4,150
IRTCInternational Rights & Territory Control File$4,850
CAVRCover, Artwork & Visual Asset Rights Record$2,850

Total illustrative fees · USD$30,500

These restored case allocations are separate from the planning bands for new quotes. A written scope and quote determine the charge for an actual matter.

Next steps

  1. Reconcile outstanding documents against the program references in the evidence index.
  2. Prepare one coordinated completion package with edition, rights and source schedules.
  3. Review each open item and record whether it is resolved, requires clarification or needs specialist referral.
  4. Issue any subsequent determination only after the evidence review is complete.

This sequence describes the modeled on hold workflow only.

Record statements

Illustrative scope. The author and publication identify a library entry. Review details and registration milestones are synthetic; book publication dates are sourced; the page makes no claim that the author applied, supplied evidence, paid fees or received a determination.

Program references. GPRCC-ILL identifiers label scenarios, not statutory registrations. Document states and allocated fees are not proof of review or payment.

Publication context. The modeled status makes no finding about the publication’s legality, accuracy, ownership or suitability. Real determinations require a submitted record and an authorized review.

Author Case Library