Home / Registry / Record
Publishing rights & compliance · Illustrative record

The Kite Runner

Popular & Young Adult Fiction · Publication and program dossier

By Khaled Hosseini

Master file reference · illustrativeGPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735
Cover of The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini
Representative publication · edition may varyFind this edition ↗ (opens in a new tab)
Illustrative case statusRegistration DeclinedScenario review date · 6 July 2003
08Program records
32Review controls
23Open items

Master case overview

Master file reference
GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735
Illustrative status
Registration Declined
Author / reference identity
Khaled Hosseini
Subject area
Popular & Young Adult Fiction
Work
The Kite Runner
Review focus
Reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation. Program questions are selected for this subject area; no passage-level findings are asserted.
Proposed formats · scenario
Print and ebook
Proposed market scope · scenario
Selected international editions; territories to be defined in the rights matrix
Book release date
29 May 2003
Publication history ↗
Registration date · illustrative
5 June 2003
Publication and registration basis
The Kite Runner: Title and author matched publication-history record. Original-language/edition differences are retained where specified. The modeled registration is seven days after release. Where a source gives only a month or year, dates are shown as a range rather than inventing a day.
Modeled review date
6 July 2003
Source basis
Library title, author, subject mapping and catalog program definitions; no manuscript examined.

Programs & status

This illustrative file covers 8 program records, 32 review controls and 23 open items. Select a program for its review details, document checklist and next action.

Submission reviewed and rejected

A completion package was submitted and reviewed in this scenario. Rejected documents show the review reason; completed items remain recorded, but the registration was declined.

9 / 32 completed
CYCSRegistration Declined

Children & Youth Content Suitability Review

GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735-CYCS

Review scope: audience definition, context guidance, review process.

3 review controls3 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$6,800

View review details ↓
LEILRegistration Declined

Library, Education & Institutional Licensing Record

GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735-LEIL

Review scope: user limits, accessible editions, catalog metadata.

3 review controls3 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$8,500

View review details ↓
ASPRRegistration Declined

Adaptation, Screen & Performance Rights Record

GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735-ASPR

Review scope: option terms, reserved rights, creative approvals.

3 review controls2 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$10,200

View review details ↓
MAARRegistration Declined

Merchandising & Ancillary Rights Record

GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735-MAAR

Review scope: ancillary scope, asset boundaries, license conditions.

5 review controls3 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$11,900

View review details ↓
TFRRRegistration Declined

Translation & Foreign Rights Record

GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735-TFRR

Review scope: translation grant, terminology control, adaptation boundaries.

4 review controls3 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$6,800

View review details ↓
IDLCRegistration Declined

International Distribution & Licensing Compliance File

GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735-IDLC

Review scope: agreement inventory, license boundaries, retail metadata.

5 review controls3 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$8,500

View review details ↓
IBEMRegistration Declined

International Brand Enforcement & Monitoring File

GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735-IBEM

Review scope: protected assets, authorized channels, monitoring exclusions.

4 review controls2 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$10,200

View review details ↓
IRTCRegistration Declined

International Rights & Territory Control File

GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735-IRTC

Review scope: chain of title, territory and format scope, edition history.

5 review controls4 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$12,100

View review details ↓
CYCS · Illustrative program record

Children & Youth Content Suitability Review

Registration Declined
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735-CYCS
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735
Review scope
Print and ebook
Evidence position
0 of 3 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini · Reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation

Submission review and rejected requirements 3

  1. CYCS-101

    Audience definition

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, identify the intended age band without treating it as a universal suitability judgment. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope.

  2. CYCS-102

    Context guidance

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, identify contextual guidance for a proposed classroom or youth edition. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation.

  3. CYCS-105

    Review process

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, define a documented local review process for disputed suitability decisions. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation.

Submission results 3

  • Intended audience briefRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope. Reference: CYCS-101.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Reader and educator context notesRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation. Reference: CYCS-102.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Suitability review protocolRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation. Reference: CYCS-105.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
Further-review standard. Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

LEIL · Illustrative program record

Library, Education & Institutional Licensing Record

Registration Declined
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735-LEIL
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735
Review scope
Print and ebook
Evidence position
0 of 3 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini · Reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation

Submission review and rejected requirements 3

  1. LEIL-102

    User limits

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, define proposed access periods and concurrent-user limits. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation.

  2. LEIL-103

    Accessible editions

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, identify authorized accessible-format delivery routes. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope.

  3. LEIL-105

    Catalog metadata

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, align institution-facing records with the selected edition. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation.

Submission results 3

  • Access and licensing scheduleRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation. Reference: LEIL-102.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Accessible edition checklistRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope. Reference: LEIL-103.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Library catalog metadata reviewRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation. Reference: LEIL-105.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
Further-review standard. Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

ASPR · Illustrative program record

Adaptation, Screen & Performance Rights Record

Registration Declined
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735-ASPR
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735
Review scope
Print and ebook
Evidence position
1 of 3 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini · Reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation

Submission review and rejected requirements 3

  1. ASPR-102

    Option terms

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, document duration, exclusivity and exercise conditions for any proposed option. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation.

  2. ASPR-103

    Reserved rights

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, identify publication and other rights excluded from the proposed grant. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries.

  3. ASPR-104

    Creative approvals

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, define any contractual consultation and approval checkpoints. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

Submission results 3

  • Option term checklistRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation. Reference: ASPR-102.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Reserved-rights matrixRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries. Reference: ASPR-103.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Adaptation approval scheduleCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: ASPR-104.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
Further-review standard. Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

MAAR · Illustrative program record

Merchandising & Ancillary Rights Record

Registration Declined
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735-MAAR
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735
Review scope
Print and ebook
Evidence position
2 of 5 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini · Reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation

Submission review and rejected requirements 5

  1. MAAR-101

    Ancillary scope

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, identify the products and uses within a proposed merchandise grant. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope.

  2. MAAR-102

    Asset boundaries

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, separate licensed character, title and artwork elements. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

  3. MAAR-103

    License conditions

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, define proposed channels, territories and quality-control responsibilities. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation.

  4. MAAR-104

    Approval samples

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, record approval stages for proposed product samples. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation.

  5. MAAR-105

    Accounting terms

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, specify reporting categories and royalty calculation inputs. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

Submission results 5

  • Ancillary rights inventoryRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope. Reference: MAAR-101.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Merchandise asset matrixCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: MAAR-102.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Merchandise license checklistRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation. Reference: MAAR-103.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Product approval workflowRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation. Reference: MAAR-104.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Ancillary royalty worksheetCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: MAAR-105.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
Further-review standard. Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

TFRR · Illustrative program record

Translation & Foreign Rights Record

Registration Declined
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735-TFRR
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735
Review scope
Print and ebook
Evidence position
1 of 4 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini · Reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation

Submission review and rejected requirements 4

  1. TFRR-101

    Translation grant

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, identify language, territory and format boundaries for a proposed translation. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries.

  2. TFRR-103

    Terminology control

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, prepare a terminology guide appropriate to the work’s subject area. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries.

  3. TFRR-104

    Adaptation boundaries

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, separate faithful translation from abridgment or local adaptation. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries.

  4. TFRR-105

    Foreign edition approval

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, define the approval process for translated covers and descriptions. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

Submission results 4

  • Foreign-rights grant matrixRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries. Reference: TFRR-101.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Translation terminology briefRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries. Reference: TFRR-103.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Translation change-control sheetRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries. Reference: TFRR-104.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Foreign edition approval checklistCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: TFRR-105.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
Further-review standard. Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

IDLC · Illustrative program record

International Distribution & Licensing Compliance File

Registration Declined
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735-IDLC
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735
Review scope
Print and ebook
Evidence position
2 of 5 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini · Reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation

Submission review and rejected requirements 5

  1. IDLC-101

    Agreement inventory

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, identify proposed publisher, distributor and retail permissions for the named work. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

  2. IDLC-102

    License boundaries

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, map term, format, territory, language and sublicensing limits. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries.

  3. IDLC-103

    Retail metadata

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, reconcile title, author credit, edition description and rights-holder attribution. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope.

  4. IDLC-104

    Accounting and reporting

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, document royalty reporting intervals, deductions and audit provisions. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

  5. IDLC-105

    Termination controls

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, define takedown, stock sell-off and rights reversion responsibilities. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation.

Submission results 5

  • Distribution agreement inventoryCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: IDLC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Distribution license matrixRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries. Reference: IDLC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Retail metadata approval sheetRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope. Reference: IDLC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Royalty and reporting scheduleCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: IDLC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Termination and reversion checklistRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation. Reference: IDLC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
Further-review standard. Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

IBEM · Illustrative program record

International Brand Enforcement & Monitoring File

Registration Declined
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735-IBEM
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735
Review scope
Print and ebook
Evidence position
2 of 4 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini · Reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation

Submission review and rejected requirements 4

  1. IBEM-101

    Protected assets

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, separate protectable text and artwork from third-party names and lawful references. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries.

  2. IBEM-102

    Authorized channels

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, distinguish approved editions and sellers from items that need verification. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

  3. IBEM-103

    Monitoring exclusions

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, exclude commentary, criticism and other lawful references from proposed monitoring. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

  4. IBEM-105

    Notice readiness

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, specify evidence capture and rights-holder approval before any proposed notice. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries.

Submission results 4

  • Protected asset inventoryRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries. Reference: IBEM-101.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Authorized edition and channel registerCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: IBEM-102.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Monitoring keyword and exclusion planCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: IBEM-103.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Evidence capture and escalation protocolRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supplied version did not reconcile the identified rights or review boundaries. Reference: IBEM-105.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
Further-review standard. Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

IRTC · Illustrative program record

International Rights & Territory Control File

Registration Declined
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735-IRTC
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2003-KH-225735
Review scope
Print and ebook
Evidence position
1 of 5 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini · Reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation

Submission review and rejected requirements 5

  1. IRTC-101

    Chain of title

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, identify the party authorized to grant rights and reconcile contributor assignments. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation.

  2. IRTC-102

    Territory and format scope

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, map languages, formats, exclusivity and reserved territories without assuming worldwide rights. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation.

  3. IRTC-103

    Edition history

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, separate original publication rights from revised-edition and supplementary-material rights. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation.

  4. IRTC-104

    Quotation permissions

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, record the basis for reuse of any third-party extracts in the proposed edition. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Rejected · scenario. Submitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope.

  5. IRTC-105

    Reversion and reservations

    For the proposed scope of The Kite Runner, identify expired grants, reserved uses and conflicting options. Apply this check in the context of reader age bands, adaptation boundaries and edition-specific presentation.

    Completed · scenario. Submitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review.

Submission results 5

  • Ownership and contributor assignment scheduleRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation. Reference: IRTC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Territory, language and format matrixRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation. Reference: IRTC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Edition and rights chronologyRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the supporting record did not substantiate the requested confirmation. Reference: IRTC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Third-party permissions registerRejectedSubmitted evidence was reviewed but rejected in this scenario: the evidence did not establish the requested scope. Reference: IRTC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
  • Prior grants and reversion scheduleCompletedSubmitted evidence was accepted in this scenario; the application was declined because other requirements failed review. Reference: IRTC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 10 June 2003 · reviewed 6 July 2003 · illustrative
Further-review standard. Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

Evidence and document index

A modeled evidence schedule for The Kite Runner. These are document requirements and scenario states, not uploaded attachments or manuscript citations.

Control referenceDocument requirementScenario state
CYCS-101Intended audience briefRejected · submitted and reviewed
CYCS-102Reader and educator context notesRejected · submitted and reviewed
CYCS-105Suitability review protocolRejected · submitted and reviewed
LEIL-102Access and licensing scheduleRejected · submitted and reviewed
LEIL-103Accessible edition checklistRejected · submitted and reviewed
LEIL-105Library catalog metadata reviewRejected · submitted and reviewed
ASPR-102Option term checklistRejected · submitted and reviewed
ASPR-103Reserved-rights matrixRejected · submitted and reviewed
ASPR-104Adaptation approval scheduleCompleted · submitted and reviewed
MAAR-101Ancillary rights inventoryRejected · submitted and reviewed
MAAR-102Merchandise asset matrixCompleted · submitted and reviewed
MAAR-103Merchandise license checklistRejected · submitted and reviewed
MAAR-104Product approval workflowRejected · submitted and reviewed
MAAR-105Ancillary royalty worksheetCompleted · submitted and reviewed
TFRR-101Foreign-rights grant matrixRejected · submitted and reviewed
TFRR-103Translation terminology briefRejected · submitted and reviewed
TFRR-104Translation change-control sheetRejected · submitted and reviewed
TFRR-105Foreign edition approval checklistCompleted · submitted and reviewed
IDLC-101Distribution agreement inventoryCompleted · submitted and reviewed
IDLC-102Distribution license matrixRejected · submitted and reviewed
IDLC-103Retail metadata approval sheetRejected · submitted and reviewed
IDLC-104Royalty and reporting scheduleCompleted · submitted and reviewed
IDLC-105Termination and reversion checklistRejected · submitted and reviewed
IBEM-101Protected asset inventoryRejected · submitted and reviewed
IBEM-102Authorized edition and channel registerCompleted · submitted and reviewed
IBEM-103Monitoring keyword and exclusion planCompleted · submitted and reviewed
IBEM-105Evidence capture and escalation protocolRejected · submitted and reviewed
IRTC-101Ownership and contributor assignment scheduleRejected · submitted and reviewed
IRTC-102Territory, language and format matrixRejected · submitted and reviewed
IRTC-103Edition and rights chronologyRejected · submitted and reviewed
IRTC-104Third-party permissions registerRejected · submitted and reviewed
IRTC-105Prior grants and reversion scheduleCompleted · submitted and reviewed

Consolidated program status

ProgramIllustrative statusOpen itemsNext action
CYCSRegistration Declined3Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps.
LEILRegistration Declined3Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps.
ASPRRegistration Declined2Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps.
MAARRegistration Declined3Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps.
TFRRRegistration Declined3Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps.
IDLCRegistration Declined3Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps.
IBEMRegistration Declined2Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps.
IRTCRegistration Declined4Any further review would require a documented route under the applicable notice process and resolution of the listed evidence gaps.

Illustrative review history

Generated milestones showing how this workflow could progress; these events did not occur for the named author.

Scenario dateModeled milestone
5 June 2003Registration modeled
10 June 2003Evidence package submitted · scenario
22 June 2003Submitted evidence reviewed · scenario
6 July 2003Submission rejected; registration declined · scenario

Program fee breakdown

The original illustrative case total is allocated across the 8 programs below. These example amounts are not payment receipts or quotations.

ProgramProgram nameAllocated fee (USD)
CYCSChildren & Youth Content Suitability Review$6,800
LEILLibrary, Education & Institutional Licensing Record$8,500
ASPRAdaptation, Screen & Performance Rights Record$10,200
MAARMerchandising & Ancillary Rights Record$11,900
TFRRTranslation & Foreign Rights Record$6,800
IDLCInternational Distribution & Licensing Compliance File$8,500
IBEMInternational Brand Enforcement & Monitoring File$10,200
IRTCInternational Rights & Territory Control File$12,100

Total illustrative fees · USD$75,000

These restored case allocations are separate from the planning bands for new quotes. A written scope and quote determine the charge for an actual matter.

Next steps

  1. Identify the requirements remaining unresolved at the modeled decision stage.
  2. Consult the applicable notice and review process before proposing a further submission.
  3. Prepare a response addressing each unresolved control; a fee or revised document alone would not guarantee approval.

This sequence describes the modeled registration declined workflow only.

Record statements

Illustrative scope. The author and publication identify a library entry. Review details and registration milestones are synthetic; book publication dates are sourced; the page makes no claim that the author applied, supplied evidence, paid fees or received a determination.

Program references. GPRCC-ILL identifiers label scenarios, not statutory registrations. Document states and allocated fees are not proof of review or payment.

Publication context. The modeled status makes no finding about the publication’s legality, accuracy, ownership or suitability. Real determinations require a submitted record and an authorized review.

Author Case Library