Why We Sleep

Master case overview

Master file reference

GPRCC-ILL-2017-MW-731621

Illustrative status

On Hold

Author / reference identity

Matthew Walker

Subject area

Health & Medicine

Work

Why We Sleep

Review focus

Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology. Program questions are selected for this subject area; no passage-level findings are asserted.

Proposed formats · scenario

Print, ebook and audiobook

Proposed market scope · scenario

Domestic release with a proposed translation-rights package

Book release date

3 October 2017
Publication history ↗

Registration date · illustrative

10 October 2017

Publication and registration basis

Why We Sleep: Title and author matched publication-history record. Original-language/edition differences are retained where specified. The modeled registration is seven days after release. Where a source gives only a month or year, dates are shown as a range rather than inventing a day.

Modeled review date

10 November 2017

Source basis

Library title, author, subject mapping and catalog program definitions; no manuscript examined.

Programs & status

This illustrative file covers 7 program records, 28 review controls and 16 open items. Select a program for its review details, document checklist and next action.

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2017-MW-731621-HMPC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2017-MW-731621

Review scope

Print, ebook and audiobook

Evidence position

3 of 5 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Why We Sleep by Matthew Walker · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 5

1. HMPC-101

   Claim classification

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, separate general discussion from diagnostic or treatment claims in the proposed scope. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

2. HMPC-102

   Evidence quality

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, record study type, limitations and relevance for claims selected for review. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

3. HMPC-103

   Professional review

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, define the qualifications and scope needed for a proposed specialist review. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

4. HMPC-104

   Reader framing

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, separate educational content from individualized advice. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

5. HMPC-105

   Evidence updates

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, identify time-sensitive health references for later rechecking. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

Requirements to complete 5

• Health claim classification ledgerCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: HMPC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 15 October 2017 · reviewed 10 November 2017 · illustrative
• Clinical evidence appraisal worksheetRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: HMPC-102.Awaiting submission · illustrative
• Specialist review briefCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: HMPC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 15 October 2017 · reviewed 10 November 2017 · illustrative
• Reader information wording sheetClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: HMPC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 15 October 2017 · reviewed 10 November 2017 · illustrative
• Health evidence update scheduleCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: HMPC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 15 October 2017 · reviewed 10 November 2017 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2017-MW-731621-FCRS

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2017-MW-731621

Review scope

Print, ebook and audiobook

Evidence position

1 of 4 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Why We Sleep by Matthew Walker · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 4

1. FCRS-101

   Claim inventory

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, classify factual, historical and statistical claims selected for the review scope. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

2. FCRS-102

   Source traceability

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, record author, date, edition and location of supporting references. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

3. FCRS-104

   Data reproduction

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, reconcile quoted figures with their source tables and units. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

4. FCRS-105

   Correction control

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, track the edition in which a proposed correction would take effect. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

Requirements to complete 4

• Claim-to-source ledgerCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: FCRS-101.Submission attempt 1 · 15 October 2017 · reviewed 10 November 2017 · illustrative
• Source bibliography and locator indexRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: FCRS-102.Awaiting submission · illustrative
• Statistical reproduction worksheetClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: FCRS-104.Submission attempt 1 · 15 October 2017 · reviewed 10 November 2017 · illustrative
• Correction and version logClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: FCRS-105.Submission attempt 1 · 15 October 2017 · reviewed 10 November 2017 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2017-MW-731621-PFVR

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2017-MW-731621

Review scope

Print, ebook and audiobook

Evidence position

1 of 3 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Why We Sleep by Matthew Walker · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 3

1. PFVR-103

   Jurisdiction wording

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, distinguish academic qualifications from jurisdiction-specific practice rights. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

2. PFVR-104

   Biography consistency

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, align proposed retailer, jacket and speaker biographies. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

3. PFVR-105

   Currency checks

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, identify which professional claims need date-sensitive confirmation. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

Requirements to complete 3

• Professional title wording matrixCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: PFVR-103.Submission attempt 1 · 15 October 2017 · reviewed 10 November 2017 · illustrative
• Biography comparison sheetRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: PFVR-104.Awaiting submission · illustrative
• Credential currency scheduleClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: PFVR-105.Submission attempt 1 · 15 October 2017 · reviewed 10 November 2017 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2017-MW-731621-AEPC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2017-MW-731621

Review scope

Print, ebook and audiobook

Evidence position

2 of 5 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Why We Sleep by Matthew Walker · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 5

1. AEPC-101

   Promotional claims

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, match proposed promotional language to documented support. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

2. AEPC-102

   Endorsement consent

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, check scope and permission for any proposed blurb or endorsement. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

3. AEPC-103

   Material connections

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, identify sponsorship disclosures that would be needed for the campaign. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

4. AEPC-104

   Excerpt context

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, retain context when selecting extracts for advertising. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

5. AEPC-105

   Campaign versions

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, keep translated campaign copy aligned with the source version. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

Requirements to complete 5

• Advertising claim matrixCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: AEPC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 15 October 2017 · reviewed 10 November 2017 · illustrative
• Endorsement permission checklistClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: AEPC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 15 October 2017 · reviewed 10 November 2017 · illustrative
• Campaign disclosure scheduleRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: AEPC-103.Awaiting submission · illustrative
• Promotional excerpt reviewCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: AEPC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 15 October 2017 · reviewed 10 November 2017 · illustrative
• Campaign version registerClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: AEPC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 15 October 2017 · reviewed 10 November 2017 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2017-MW-731621-IMRC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2017-MW-731621

Review scope

Print, ebook and audiobook

Evidence position

1 of 3 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Why We Sleep by Matthew Walker · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 3

1. IMRC-101

   Fact and opinion boundaries

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, separate editorial interpretation from independently checkable claims in proposed publicity. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

2. IMRC-104

   Edition-specific publicity

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, align retailer summaries and campaign copy with the edition proposed for release. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

3. IMRC-105

   Escalation protocol

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, define which disputed statements would require specialist review before reuse. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

Requirements to complete 3

• Publicity claim and source ledgerRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: IMRC-101.Awaiting submission · illustrative
• Campaign and jacket-copy comparisonClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IMRC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 15 October 2017 · reviewed 10 November 2017 · illustrative
• Media review escalation planCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IMRC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 15 October 2017 · reviewed 10 November 2017 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2017-MW-731621-IDLC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2017-MW-731621

Review scope

Print, ebook and audiobook

Evidence position

2 of 5 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Why We Sleep by Matthew Walker · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 5

1. IDLC-101

   Agreement inventory

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, identify proposed publisher, distributor and retail permissions for the named work. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

2. IDLC-102

   License boundaries

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, map term, format, territory, language and sublicensing limits. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

3. IDLC-103

   Retail metadata

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, reconcile title, author credit, edition description and rights-holder attribution. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

4. IDLC-104

   Accounting and reporting

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, document royalty reporting intervals, deductions and audit provisions. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

5. IDLC-105

   Termination controls

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, define takedown, stock sell-off and rights reversion responsibilities. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

Requirements to complete 5

• Distribution agreement inventoryCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IDLC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 15 October 2017 · reviewed 10 November 2017 · illustrative
• Distribution license matrixCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IDLC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 15 October 2017 · reviewed 10 November 2017 · illustrative
• Retail metadata approval sheetClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IDLC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 15 October 2017 · reviewed 10 November 2017 · illustrative
• Royalty and reporting scheduleRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: IDLC-104.Awaiting submission · illustrative
• Termination and reversion checklistClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IDLC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 15 October 2017 · reviewed 10 November 2017 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Program reference

GPRCC-ILL-2017-MW-731621-IRTC

Master file

GPRCC-ILL-2017-MW-731621

Review scope

Print, ebook and audiobook

Evidence position

2 of 3 controls complete in scenario

Publication context

Why We Sleep by Matthew Walker · Health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology

Review controls and outstanding items 3

1. IRTC-103

   Edition history

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, separate original publication rights from revised-edition and supplementary-material rights. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

2. IRTC-104

   Quotation permissions

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, record the basis for reuse of any third-party extracts in the proposed edition. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

3. IRTC-105

   Reversion and reservations

   For the proposed scope of Why We Sleep, identify expired grants, reserved uses and conflicting options. Apply this check in the context of health evidence, reader framing and professional terminology.

   Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

Requirements to complete 3

• Edition and rights chronologyRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: IRTC-103.Awaiting submission · illustrative
• Third-party permissions registerCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IRTC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 15 October 2017 · reviewed 10 November 2017 · illustrative
• Prior grants and reversion scheduleCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IRTC-105.Submission attempt 1 · 15 October 2017 · reviewed 10 November 2017 · illustrative

↑ Back to programs

Evidence and document index

A modeled evidence schedule for Why We Sleep. These are document requirements and scenario states, not uploaded attachments or manuscript citations.

Consolidated program status

Illustrative review history

Generated milestones showing how this workflow could progress; these events did not occur for the named author.

Program fee breakdown

The original illustrative case total is allocated across the 7 programs below. These example amounts are not payment receipts or quotations.

Total illustrative fees · USD$40,000

These restored case allocations are separate from the planning bands for new quotes. A written scope and quote determine the charge for an actual matter.

Next steps

1. Reconcile outstanding documents against the program references in the evidence index.
2. Prepare one coordinated completion package with edition, rights and source schedules.
3. Review each open item and record whether it is resolved, requires clarification or needs specialist referral.
4. Issue any subsequent determination only after the evidence review is complete.

This sequence describes the modeled on hold workflow only.