Home / Registry / Record
Publishing rights & compliance · Illustrative record

The 1619 Project

Race & Identity · Publication and program dossier

By Nikole Hannah-Jones

Master file reference · illustrativeGPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295
Cover of The 1619 Project by Nikole Hannah-Jones
Representative publication · edition may varyFind this edition ↗ (opens in a new tab)
Illustrative case statusOn HoldScenario review date · 24 December 2021
09Program records
35Review controls
22Open items

Master case overview

Master file reference
GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295
Illustrative status
On Hold
Author / reference identity
Nikole Hannah-Jones
Subject area
Race & Identity
Work
The 1619 Project
Review focus
Historical context, identity terminology and source attribution. Program questions are selected for this subject area; no passage-level findings are asserted.
Proposed formats · scenario
Ebook and library editions
Proposed market scope · scenario
Selected international editions; territories to be defined in the rights matrix
Book release date
16 November 2021
Open Library ↗
Registration date · illustrative
23 November 2021
Publication and registration basis
The 1619 Project: Earliest dated catalog edition in the recorded first-publication year; editions may vary. The modeled registration is seven days after release. Where a source gives only a month or year, dates are shown as a range rather than inventing a day.
Modeled review date
24 December 2021
Source basis
Library title, author, subject mapping and catalog program definitions; no manuscript examined.

Programs & status

This illustrative file covers 9 program records, 35 review controls and 22 open items. Select a program for its review details, document checklist and next action.

Requirements outstanding

Completed items are marked with a check. Required or clarification items must be resolved before this scenario can proceed.

13 / 35 completed
IMRCOn Hold

International Media & Reputation Clearance File

GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295-IMRC

Review scope: interview preparation, edition-specific publicity, escalation protocol.

3 review controls1 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$3,900

View review details ↓
FCRSOn Hold

Fact-Checking & Research Substantiation File

GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295-FCRS

Review scope: source traceability, context and limitations, data reproduction.

4 review controls2 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$2,200

View review details ↓
PPASOn Hold

Public Figure & Public Affairs Source Review

GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295-PPAS

Review scope: public-record sourcing, quotation context, opinion classification.

4 review controls1 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$2,750

View review details ↓
LEILOn Hold

Library, Education & Institutional Licensing Record

GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295-LEIL

Review scope: institutional use, accessible editions, excerpt reuse.

3 review controls2 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$3,350

View review details ↓
IDLCOn Hold

International Distribution & Licensing Compliance File

GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295-IDLC

Review scope: agreement inventory, license boundaries, retail metadata.

4 review controls3 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$3,900

View review details ↓
AVRROn Hold

Audiobook, Narration & Voice Rights Record

GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295-AVRR

Review scope: performer agreement, audio-only material, pronunciation guidance.

4 review controls3 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$2,200

View review details ↓
IRTCOn Hold

International Rights & Territory Control File

GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295-IRTC

Review scope: chain of title, territory and format scope, edition history.

5 review controls5 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$2,750

View review details ↓
CAVROn Hold

Cover, Artwork & Visual Asset Rights Record

GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295-CAVR

Review scope: visual asset provenance, format reuse, edition approval.

3 review controls2 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$3,350

View review details ↓
IBEMOn Hold

International Brand Enforcement & Monitoring File

GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295-IBEM

Review scope: protected assets, authorized channels, monitoring exclusions.

5 review controls3 open items

Illustrative fee · USD$4,100

View review details ↓
IMRC · Illustrative program record

International Media & Reputation Clearance File

On Hold
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295-IMRC
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295
Review scope
Ebook and library editions
Evidence position
2 of 3 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The 1619 Project by Nikole Hannah-Jones · Historical context, identity terminology and source attribution

Review controls and outstanding items 3

  1. IMRC-103

    Interview preparation

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, prepare source-backed responses and distinguish the author’s position from promotional paraphrases. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

  2. IMRC-104

    Edition-specific publicity

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, align retailer summaries and campaign copy with the edition proposed for release. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

  3. IMRC-105

    Escalation protocol

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, define which disputed statements would require specialist review before reuse. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

Requirements to complete 3

  • Interview and media briefingCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IMRC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
  • Campaign and jacket-copy comparisonCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IMRC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
  • Media review escalation planRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: IMRC-105.Awaiting submission · illustrative
Further-review standard. Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

FCRS · Illustrative program record

Fact-Checking & Research Substantiation File

On Hold
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295-FCRS
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295
Review scope
Ebook and library editions
Evidence position
2 of 4 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The 1619 Project by Nikole Hannah-Jones · Historical context, identity terminology and source attribution

Review controls and outstanding items 4

  1. FCRS-102

    Source traceability

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, record author, date, edition and location of supporting references. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

  2. FCRS-103

    Context and limitations

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, retain qualifications and avoid widening conclusions beyond their sources. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

  3. FCRS-104

    Data reproduction

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, reconcile quoted figures with their source tables and units. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

  4. FCRS-105

    Correction control

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, track the edition in which a proposed correction would take effect. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

Requirements to complete 4

  • Source bibliography and locator indexClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: FCRS-102.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
  • Claim qualification scheduleCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: FCRS-103.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
  • Statistical reproduction worksheetCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: FCRS-104.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
  • Correction and version logRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: FCRS-105.Awaiting submission · illustrative
Further-review standard. Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

PPAS · Illustrative program record

Public Figure & Public Affairs Source Review

On Hold
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295-PPAS
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295
Review scope
Ebook and library editions
Evidence position
3 of 4 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The 1619 Project by Nikole Hannah-Jones · Historical context, identity terminology and source attribution

Review controls and outstanding items 4

  1. PPAS-101

    Public-record sourcing

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, link checkable public-affairs statements to their original records. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

  2. PPAS-102

    Quotation context

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, retain the context and date of any quotations selected for publicity. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

  3. PPAS-103

    Opinion classification

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, distinguish commentary from allegations and factual assertions. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

  4. PPAS-104

    Institution references

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, avoid presenting an institution’s mention as its endorsement. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

Requirements to complete 4

  • Public-record source ledgerCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: PPAS-101.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
  • Quotation context sheetCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: PPAS-102.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
  • Fact and opinion classification matrixCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: PPAS-103.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
  • Institution reference reviewRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: PPAS-104.Awaiting submission · illustrative
Further-review standard. Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

LEIL · Illustrative program record

Library, Education & Institutional Licensing Record

On Hold
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295-LEIL
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295
Review scope
Ebook and library editions
Evidence position
1 of 3 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The 1619 Project by Nikole Hannah-Jones · Historical context, identity terminology and source attribution

Review controls and outstanding items 3

  1. LEIL-101

    Institutional use

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, distinguish lending, classroom distribution and course-pack reproduction. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

  2. LEIL-103

    Accessible editions

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, identify authorized accessible-format delivery routes. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

  3. LEIL-104

    Excerpt reuse

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, document the scope of permitted educational extracts. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

Requirements to complete 3

  • Institutional use matrixRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: LEIL-101.Awaiting submission · illustrative
  • Accessible edition checklistClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: LEIL-103.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
  • Educational excerpt permission sheetCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: LEIL-104.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
Further-review standard. Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

IDLC · Illustrative program record

International Distribution & Licensing Compliance File

On Hold
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295-IDLC
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295
Review scope
Ebook and library editions
Evidence position
1 of 4 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The 1619 Project by Nikole Hannah-Jones · Historical context, identity terminology and source attribution

Review controls and outstanding items 4

  1. IDLC-101

    Agreement inventory

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, identify proposed publisher, distributor and retail permissions for the named work. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

  2. IDLC-102

    License boundaries

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, map term, format, territory, language and sublicensing limits. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

  3. IDLC-103

    Retail metadata

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, reconcile title, author credit, edition description and rights-holder attribution. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

  4. IDLC-104

    Accounting and reporting

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, document royalty reporting intervals, deductions and audit provisions. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

Requirements to complete 4

  • Distribution agreement inventoryClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IDLC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
  • Distribution license matrixClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IDLC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
  • Retail metadata approval sheetRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: IDLC-103.Awaiting submission · illustrative
  • Royalty and reporting scheduleCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IDLC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
Further-review standard. Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

AVRR · Illustrative program record

Audiobook, Narration & Voice Rights Record

On Hold
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295-AVRR
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295
Review scope
Ebook and library editions
Evidence position
1 of 4 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The 1619 Project by Nikole Hannah-Jones · Historical context, identity terminology and source attribution

Review controls and outstanding items 4

  1. AVRR-102

    Performer agreement

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, define narrator credit, recording use and permitted reuse. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

  2. AVRR-103

    Audio-only material

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, identify proposed introductions, music and other added audio assets. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

  3. AVRR-104

    Pronunciation guidance

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, prepare a subject-appropriate name and terminology pronunciation guide. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

  4. AVRR-105

    Audio metadata

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, align abridgment labels, credits and edition descriptions. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

Requirements to complete 4

  • Narrator agreement checklistRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: AVRR-102.Awaiting submission · illustrative
  • Audio asset permission registerCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: AVRR-103.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
  • Pronunciation and production briefClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: AVRR-104.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
  • Audio edition metadata sheetClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: AVRR-105.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
Further-review standard. Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

IRTC · Illustrative program record

International Rights & Territory Control File

On Hold
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295-IRTC
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295
Review scope
Ebook and library editions
Evidence position
0 of 5 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The 1619 Project by Nikole Hannah-Jones · Historical context, identity terminology and source attribution

Review controls and outstanding items 5

  1. IRTC-101

    Chain of title

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, identify the party authorized to grant rights and reconcile contributor assignments. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

  2. IRTC-102

    Territory and format scope

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, map languages, formats, exclusivity and reserved territories without assuming worldwide rights. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

  3. IRTC-103

    Edition history

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, separate original publication rights from revised-edition and supplementary-material rights. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

  4. IRTC-104

    Quotation permissions

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, record the basis for reuse of any third-party extracts in the proposed edition. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

  5. IRTC-105

    Reversion and reservations

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, identify expired grants, reserved uses and conflicting options. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

Requirements to complete 5

  • Ownership and contributor assignment scheduleClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IRTC-101.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
  • Territory, language and format matrixClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IRTC-102.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
  • Edition and rights chronologyClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IRTC-103.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
  • Third-party permissions registerClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IRTC-104.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
  • Prior grants and reversion scheduleRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: IRTC-105.Awaiting submission · illustrative
Further-review standard. Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

CAVR · Illustrative program record

Cover, Artwork & Visual Asset Rights Record

On Hold
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295-CAVR
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295
Review scope
Ebook and library editions
Evidence position
1 of 3 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The 1619 Project by Nikole Hannah-Jones · Historical context, identity terminology and source attribution

Review controls and outstanding items 3

  1. CAVR-101

    Visual asset provenance

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, record the source and permitted use of cover and interior visual assets. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

  2. CAVR-103

    Format reuse

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, check proposed visual reuse across print, ebook, audio and promotion. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

  3. CAVR-105

    Edition approval

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, track the approved cover version for each proposed edition. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

Requirements to complete 3

  • Cover and artwork provenance registerCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: CAVR-101.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
  • Visual reuse permission matrixClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: CAVR-103.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
  • Cover version approval logRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: CAVR-105.Awaiting submission · illustrative
Further-review standard. Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

IBEM · Illustrative program record

International Brand Enforcement & Monitoring File

On Hold
Program reference
GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295-IBEM
Master file
GPRCC-ILL-2021-NHJ-107295
Review scope
Ebook and library editions
Evidence position
2 of 5 controls complete in scenario
Publication context
The 1619 Project by Nikole Hannah-Jones · Historical context, identity terminology and source attribution

Review controls and outstanding items 5

  1. IBEM-101

    Protected assets

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, separate protectable text and artwork from third-party names and lawful references. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

  2. IBEM-102

    Authorized channels

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, distinguish approved editions and sellers from items that need verification. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Completed · scenario. The submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open.

  3. IBEM-103

    Monitoring exclusions

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, exclude commentary, criticism and other lawful references from proposed monitoring. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

  4. IBEM-104

    Control verification

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, identify who may authorize use of the proposed author and publication branding. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Clarification needed · scenario. The scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close.

  5. IBEM-105

    Notice readiness

    For the proposed scope of The 1619 Project, specify evidence capture and rights-holder approval before any proposed notice. Apply this check in the context of historical context, identity terminology and source attribution.

    Required · scenario. The scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding.

Requirements to complete 5

  • Protected asset inventoryCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IBEM-101.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
  • Authorized edition and channel registerCompletedThe submitted evidence is accepted in this scenario; other requirements remain open. Reference: IBEM-102.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
  • Monitoring keyword and exclusion planClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IBEM-103.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
  • Brand and account control checklistClarification neededThe scenario requires clarification of scope before this item can close. Reference: IBEM-104.Submission attempt 1 · 28 November 2021 · reviewed 24 December 2021 · illustrative
  • Evidence capture and escalation protocolRequiredThe scenario leaves this evidence item outstanding. Reference: IBEM-105.Awaiting submission · illustrative
Further-review standard. Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination. This is a modeled workflow, not a notice issued to the author.

↑ Back to programs

Evidence and document index

A modeled evidence schedule for The 1619 Project. These are document requirements and scenario states, not uploaded attachments or manuscript citations.

Control referenceDocument requirementScenario state
IMRC-103Interview and media briefingCompleted · submitted and reviewed
IMRC-104Campaign and jacket-copy comparisonCompleted · submitted and reviewed
IMRC-105Media review escalation planRequired · awaiting submission
FCRS-102Source bibliography and locator indexClarification needed · submitted and reviewed
FCRS-103Claim qualification scheduleCompleted · submitted and reviewed
FCRS-104Statistical reproduction worksheetCompleted · submitted and reviewed
FCRS-105Correction and version logRequired · awaiting submission
PPAS-101Public-record source ledgerCompleted · submitted and reviewed
PPAS-102Quotation context sheetCompleted · submitted and reviewed
PPAS-103Fact and opinion classification matrixCompleted · submitted and reviewed
PPAS-104Institution reference reviewRequired · awaiting submission
LEIL-101Institutional use matrixRequired · awaiting submission
LEIL-103Accessible edition checklistClarification needed · submitted and reviewed
LEIL-104Educational excerpt permission sheetCompleted · submitted and reviewed
IDLC-101Distribution agreement inventoryClarification needed · submitted and reviewed
IDLC-102Distribution license matrixClarification needed · submitted and reviewed
IDLC-103Retail metadata approval sheetRequired · awaiting submission
IDLC-104Royalty and reporting scheduleCompleted · submitted and reviewed
AVRR-102Narrator agreement checklistRequired · awaiting submission
AVRR-103Audio asset permission registerCompleted · submitted and reviewed
AVRR-104Pronunciation and production briefClarification needed · submitted and reviewed
AVRR-105Audio edition metadata sheetClarification needed · submitted and reviewed
IRTC-101Ownership and contributor assignment scheduleClarification needed · submitted and reviewed
IRTC-102Territory, language and format matrixClarification needed · submitted and reviewed
IRTC-103Edition and rights chronologyClarification needed · submitted and reviewed
IRTC-104Third-party permissions registerClarification needed · submitted and reviewed
IRTC-105Prior grants and reversion scheduleRequired · awaiting submission
CAVR-101Cover and artwork provenance registerCompleted · submitted and reviewed
CAVR-103Visual reuse permission matrixClarification needed · submitted and reviewed
CAVR-105Cover version approval logRequired · awaiting submission
IBEM-101Protected asset inventoryCompleted · submitted and reviewed
IBEM-102Authorized edition and channel registerCompleted · submitted and reviewed
IBEM-103Monitoring keyword and exclusion planClarification needed · submitted and reviewed
IBEM-104Brand and account control checklistClarification needed · submitted and reviewed
IBEM-105Evidence capture and escalation protocolRequired · awaiting submission

Consolidated program status

ProgramIllustrative statusOpen itemsNext action
IMRCOn Hold1Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination.
FCRSOn Hold2Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination.
PPASOn Hold1Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination.
LEILOn Hold2Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination.
IDLCOn Hold3Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination.
AVRROn Hold3Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination.
IRTCOn Hold5Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination.
CAVROn Hold2Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination.
IBEMOn Hold3Supply each outstanding item, resolve scope questions and reconcile the evidence schedule before a further determination.

Illustrative review history

Generated milestones showing how this workflow could progress; these events did not occur for the named author.

Scenario dateModeled milestone
23 November 2021Registration modeled
28 November 2021Evidence package submitted · scenario
10 December 2021Submitted evidence reviewed · scenario
24 December 2021Completion request modeled

Program fee breakdown

The original illustrative case total is allocated across the 9 programs below. These example amounts are not payment receipts or quotations.

ProgramProgram nameAllocated fee (USD)
IMRCInternational Media & Reputation Clearance File$3,900
FCRSFact-Checking & Research Substantiation File$2,200
PPASPublic Figure & Public Affairs Source Review$2,750
LEILLibrary, Education & Institutional Licensing Record$3,350
IDLCInternational Distribution & Licensing Compliance File$3,900
AVRRAudiobook, Narration & Voice Rights Record$2,200
IRTCInternational Rights & Territory Control File$2,750
CAVRCover, Artwork & Visual Asset Rights Record$3,350
IBEMInternational Brand Enforcement & Monitoring File$4,100

Total illustrative fees · USD$28,500

These restored case allocations are separate from the planning bands for new quotes. A written scope and quote determine the charge for an actual matter.

Next steps

  1. Reconcile outstanding documents against the program references in the evidence index.
  2. Prepare one coordinated completion package with edition, rights and source schedules.
  3. Review each open item and record whether it is resolved, requires clarification or needs specialist referral.
  4. Issue any subsequent determination only after the evidence review is complete.

This sequence describes the modeled on hold workflow only.

Record statements

Illustrative scope. The author and publication identify a library entry. Review details and registration milestones are synthetic; book publication dates are sourced; the page makes no claim that the author applied, supplied evidence, paid fees or received a determination.

Program references. GPRCC-ILL identifiers label scenarios, not statutory registrations. Document states and allocated fees are not proof of review or payment.

Publication context. The modeled status makes no finding about the publication’s legality, accuracy, ownership or suitability. Real determinations require a submitted record and an authorized review.

Author Case Library